Přístupový systém / Access and doors
Authorisation instead of keys. Who is allowed where is set from one place and changed immediately, rather than replacing cylinders and issuing new keys.
A mechanical key carries its own authorisation. If someone loses it or leaves without returning it, the only certainty is replacing the lock cylinder and issuing new keys to everyone who uses the premises. The more doors and people involved, the more painful this becomes, so in practice it is often postponed. The result is a building where no one knows how many keys are in circulation.
In the access control system, authorisation is held in the database. The card is merely an identity carrier, so it can be blocked within a minute without requiring changes to the rest of the system. An employee's departure is a single step, not a logistical operation.

The most common reason why the system diverges from reality after a year is the assignment of rights to individuals. With every new hire and transfer, someone has to manually reconfigure sets of doors by clicking, and sooner or later makes a mistake. The sustainable approach is to set up roles, i.e., groups of doors and time periods according to position, and assign these roles to people. Onboarding then becomes a single assignment, offboarding a single removal.
| Mechanical keys | Přístupový systém | |
|---|---|---|
| Change of authorisation | Replacement of lock cylinders, key issuance. | Software change, effective immediately. |
| Loss of carrier | The risk persists until the cartridge is replaced. | Lockout within a minute. |
| Overview of access records | None. | Record of who passed through where and when. |
| Time restriction | Not possible. | Role valid until a specified date with night-time restrictions. |
| Power outage | It always works. | Settled by deposit and lock selection; mandatory for escape routes. |
Access control and attendance systems usually operate as a single unit using one card. When purchased separately, infrastructure costs are incurred twice and the employee must carry two carriers.
For sites and buildings with reception, the same access rights are extended to turnstiles, barriers and gates. The logic remains unchanged; only the mechanics and equipment cost differ. Considerations include peak-time throughput, trolley access, barrier-free passage and operation in the event of a fire alarm.
The key carries the authorisation within itself, so changing authorisations requires replacing the cylinder and issuing new keys. In an access control system, the database holds the authorisations, so changes are made from a computer and take effect immediately. A lost card can be blocked within a minute; for a lost key, the cylinder must be replaced. The second difference is oversight: the system records who passed where and when, whereas a mechanical key does not.
It depends on the choice of lock and whether the doors are part of an escape route. On escape routes, exit without a key must be ensured and takes precedence over security. This is addressed through a combination of lock type, backup power supply and emergency release. It is a design matter that needs to be resolved before installation, not after commissioning.
Yes, and this is a common requirement for sites. A turnstile, a parking barrier and office doors can all operate with the same card and the same authorisations. The difference lies in the mechanics and the price of the device itself, not in the system logic.
Often yes, if it is a scalable platform and documentation is available. Sometimes it pays to replace the PBX while keeping the readers, sometimes the reverse. During inspection we assess what can be reused; replacing the entire system is the last resort, not the default offer.
We only need the number of employees, the number of doors, and whether you operate shifts. We will contact you within 24 hours on working days to discuss details and arrange an on-site inspection. The inspection and proposal are free and non-binding.
Call on working days; we will go through it together in ten minutes.
277 278 919