Přístupový systém / Attendance terminals
The terminal is the cheapest and most easily replaceable part of the system, yet it is usually where selection begins. Here is how the different identification methods differ and when each makes sense.
| Chip or card | Fingerprint | Face | Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speed | Immediate | One to two seconds | Immediate | Immediate |
| Lending between individuals | Possible; that is its weakness. | Excluded | Excluded | Possible but impractical |
| GDPR | Standard personal data | Biometrics, special category | Biometrics, special category | Standard personal data |
| Operation with gloves | Operational | Not working | Operational | Inconvenient |
| What to do in case of loss | Block and issue a new one | Cannot be lost | Cannot be lost | Revoke device authorization |
| Cost | Lowest | Higher-end terminal | Top-tier terminal | Low, without carriers |
In practice, most operations combine two methods: a chip as the primary method and a second method where there is a specific reason for it. Widespread biometrics is an expensive option that brings additional GDPR obligations and addresses a problem that some companies do not have at all.

The attendance terminal has a display, shows the status and offers reasons for leaving, such as a business trip or a doctor's appointment. The door reader simply decides whether to open. Both have their place in one system: the terminal at the entrance to the premises for attendance and readers on individual doors for access rights. We describe this division on the page about access system.
The terminal will likely be replaced in five years; your rules and authorisations will carry forward. That is why, when selecting a system, we first ask about operations and only then about the equipment.
A chip or card is the cheapest and fastest option and sufficient for most operations. Fingerprint and facial recognition address only one specific issue: lending chips between individuals. However, these are biometric data, a special category under GDPR, requiring a legal basis and an impact assessment. We recommend them only where chip sharing actually occurs, not universally.
Outdoor versions are available; they differ in protection rating and operating temperature range and are more expensive than indoor ones. For gloves, contactless reading at a longer distance or a fob is usually selected, as fingerprint scanning through a glove does not work. This is a typical issue identified during inspection that changes the design.
Nothing dramatic if the system has an approval workflow configured. The missing record is added, the correction is submitted to the supervisor for approval, and an audit trail remains showing who made it. It is important that this can be done from the application without needing to resolve it through payroll accounting at the end of the month.
Yes, with newer terminals. This makes sense where staff change rapidly and you do not want to issue and collect physical carriers, or for external workers. The disadvantage is dependence on a charged phone and the employee having it with them. Most operations therefore combine mobile with a chip, rather than replacing it.
We only need the number of employees, the number of doors, and whether you operate shifts. We will contact you within 24 hours on working days to discuss details and arrange an on-site inspection. The inspection and proposal are free and non-binding.
Call on working days; we will go through it together in ten minutes.
277 278 919